The role of money in adoption - Part 1
Ok so this subject may well be uncomfortable for some and controversial for others, but I think it is an important aspect of adoption and worthy of discussion.
No one likes to think of adoption as a commercial transaction, but in some ways it is and in some ways it is unlike any commercial transaction that exists.
A quick disclaimer, what I describe below is specific to Ontario, but I believe the system is more or less the same in the other provinces. As always I would love to hear from people about how the system in other provinces might be different.
The first step anyone wishing to adopt takes is to retain the services of an adoption practitioner. This is the first place where things get a little weird. It feels like you are paying someone to provide you with a service, a particular product (the homestudy report) in a particular timeframe, along with general advice and support. The interesting twist is that the practitioner is not really working for you. They are really working on behalf of the Provincial Ministry in some respects. After all the report is for the Ministry and their responsibility is largely to the Provincial Ministry. In what other situation do you pay someone for a service where at the end of it the person you retained would be completely within their rights to not provide you with a product (a homestudy report with a positive recommendation) that you wanted to obtain.
The problem with this system is that people often feel like they cant have the normal expectations someone might have when you pay someone to do something for you. The big one that I hear over and over is in terms of schedule. People sometimes feel uncomfortable being the tiniest bit demanding on this subject for fear of risking that positive recommendation. I just wish there was a way to get rid of this conflict.
For public adoptions the issue is a bit different. With the homestudy being provided for free by the Children’s aid society the problem is that they really own the homestudy and not you. My sense is that this sometimes translates to it feeling like they own you as well.
To come: Part 2 - Payments to agencies, Part 3 - IA payments.